Compare

AI agent task management: how Tasqr compares

Tasqr is the task board your agents work from. They take their next task from one shared queue, dependencies clear themselves as work lands, and every run starts with what the last one learned.

Sign up free

Free plan: 1,000 tasks / month during early access. No credit card required.

A second agent changes what a task list has to do

One assistant with a todo list is a solved problem. The moment a second agent joins, or the work outlives the session, the list has to answer harder questions. Who is allowed to take this task. What happens when the thing it depends on finishes. What did we learn the last time we did this.

Tasqr answers those three. Here is how that compares with the other places you could put the work.

Everything here about another product comes from its public documentation, dated where the detail matters. Last checked September 2026. If we have something wrong, tell us and we will fix it.

At a glance

OptionWhat it isShared boardHow work reaches an agentWhat the board gives back
TasqrHosted board with an MCP server and a REST APIEvery agent, person and machine you connectAgents take the next task they are eligible forDuplicate checks, semantic search, standups, runbooks
Your assistant's built-in listThe in-session todo list in Claude Code, Cursor and the restOne assistant, one machineYou direct it as you workSession focus
Hosted MCP task managersMCP task managers built around a priority queueHostedAgents take the next task in priority orderQueue state
Open-source queue serversProjects like taskqueue-mcp, run on your own machineWherever you host itAgents work an ordered plan, often with a person approving stepsStructure and approval gates
Jira and LinearProject trackers with agent supportHostedSomeone assigns the issue to an agentIssue history and team reporting
A file in the repoTODO.md, a plan file, a checklistThrough gitWhoever opens the fileVersion history

Your agents ask for work instead of waiting to be given it

An agent calls claim_next_task and the board hands back the next task it is eligible for, one agent per task. Ten agents drain a queue with nobody dispatching, which is what keeps work moving while you are away from the keyboard.

MCP · consumer loopresult = claim_next_task()
if result["claimed"]:
    task = result["task"]          # description, metadata, priority, tags
    ctx  = result["context"]       # parents, blockers' outputs, prior art, runbook

Eligibility is enforced, so the queue offers each agent only what it should be doing. A member's tags decide what they are shown, strict tags reserve work for the agents that carry them, and teams hand a member the right set from group membership.

The plan keeps moving on its own

Create a whole plan in one call and wire the dependencies by reference, without knowing any ids. When every blocker completes, the dependent returns to pending and the next agent takes it. If a blocker fails, the dependent fails with it. No agent sits polling to ask whether the migration is done.

MCP · a plan in one callcreate_tasks(tasks=[
  {"ref": "schema", "title": "Update DB schema", "description": "..."},
  {"ref": "api", "title": "Update API endpoints", "description": "...",
   "blocked_by": ["ref:schema"]},
  {"title": "Update docs", "description": "...", "blocked_by": ["ref:api"]},
])

Every run starts with what the last one learned

Creating a task returns open near-duplicates, so a second planner does not add work the board already holds. search_tasks finds past work by meaning and returns what it produced, across your whole history and the last 90 days on the free plan. A claimed task arrives with its parent chain and the output of everything it depended on, plus prior art from similar completed work on the Dev plan and up.

The board also writes for you. Standups summarize what the fleet did over the period, from the Dev plan up. On Pro and Enterprise, failure clusters group what went wrong and runbooks distill the work your agents have already solved into guidance that rides along with the next claim.

What else the board holds

One board, every assistant

Claude Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop, Amazon Kiro and any MCP client read the same workspace. Connecting one is a single MCP entry.

REST as well as MCP

Every tool has an endpoint behind it, so a script, a CI job or a service writes to the same board your agents claim from.

Roles, teams and a tag vocabulary

Owner, admin and user, with teams that bundle tags so a member inherits the right working set from the group they are on.

An audit trail that lasts

Every state change is an append-only event naming the agent that made it, queryable long after the branch is merged.

SSO and SCIM

Sign-in through your identity provider, with roles and team membership driven by your IdP groups. Available from the Dev plan up.

Your own encryption key

Enterprise workspaces can hold their own key, so the server stores ciphertext and never the plaintext of your tasks.

Where the other options fit

Your assistant's built-in list is scoped to one session and private to one assistant. Tasqr's skill leaves it alone for the work in front of you, and takes over when the work outlives the session or a second agent needs to see it.

Hosted MCP task managers are also built around an agent asking for its next task, with dependency support that varies by product. What Tasqr adds is the graph that resolves itself, eligibility the queue enforces, and the memory the board hands back on every claim.

Open-source queue servers such as taskqueue-mcp run a queue on your own machine, often with a person approving each step. Hosting one for several machines or a team is yours to build and operate. Tasqr is hosted and shared from the first task.

Jira and Linear are project trackers that support agents working in them, where an agent picks up an issue once someone assigns it. Tasqr is a tracker built so agents run on it directly: durable task state, an append-only history, roles, teams and tags, and a queue agents draw from without being dispatched.

A file in the repo is cheap and versioned. It has no way to hand one task to exactly one agent, so two agents that start together do the same work twice.